What Is Big O Notation? Cheat Sheet, Examples & Calculator
By
Liz Fujiwara
•
Oct 23, 2025
This Big O Notation cheat sheet serves as a concise and practical reference for understanding algorithmic complexities. Whether you’re a student preparing for exams, a developer optimizing code, or a job seeker tackling technical interviews, this guide helps you quickly assess the time and space requirements of algorithms. By providing clear explanations and common examples of different Big O classifications, it allows you to evaluate efficiency, make informed design decisions, and write faster, more scalable code. Keep this cheat sheet handy to master the fundamentals of algorithm analysis in one convenient place.
Key Takeaways
Big O notation is a fundamental concept in computer science used to evaluate the efficiency of algorithms by describing their time and space complexity relative to input size.
Understanding Big O is crucial for software engineers aiming to optimize algorithm performance, particularly when handling large data sets, by focusing on worst-case scenarios.
Alongside Big Ω (Omega) and Big Θ (Theta) notations, Big O provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing algorithm efficiency, offering insights into upper and lower performance bounds.
What Is Big O Notation?
Big O notation is a cornerstone concept in computer science, used to describe the upper bound of an algorithm’s time or space requirements. It classifies algorithms based on how their runtime or memory usage grows with input size, providing a consistent mathematical framework for representing efficiency. Essentially, Big O measures an algorithm’s performance in the worst-case scenario, helping engineers understand and compare scalability.
Big O captures how an algorithm’s efficiency changes as input size increases. Time complexity reflects the execution time relative to input size, while space complexity represents the memory consumed by the algorithm. Formally, Big O notation defines that a function f(n) grows no faster than c * g(n) for all n ≥ n₀, enabling precise evaluation and comparison of different algorithms’ scalability.
Why Big O Notation Matters
In software development, Big O notation is more than a theoretical concept as it is a practical tool for designing efficient algorithms and understanding their execution speed. Engineers use Big O to compare the performance of different solutions, which is especially valuable when working with large data sets where algorithm efficiency can significantly impact overall system performance.
Big O primarily evaluates the worst-case performance of algorithms, predicting how they behave as input size grows. By understanding time complexity, software engineers can select the most suitable algorithms, ensuring optimal performance and efficient resource use.
Think of it as a crystal ball for your code, revealing its future behavior and helping you make informed decisions while avoiding potential performance pitfalls.
Common Big O Notations with Examples
Big O notation categorizes algorithms based on their runtime complexity, providing a framework for understanding how different algorithms perform as input sizes grow. We will explore various common Big O notations, each representing a different type of time complexity. From constant to factorial time, these categories illustrate the scalability and efficiency of algorithms.
We’ll cover each type of time complexity with real-world examples, from the simplest O(1) to the more complex O(n!) scenarios. By the end, you’ll have a firm grasp of how different time complexities affect algorithm performance, supported by practical examples.
Constant Time Complexity: O(1)
Constant time complexity, represented as O(1), indicates that the algorithm’s runtime does not grow with the input size. This means a fixed number of operations are needed regardless of the input size, making it one of the most efficient complexities. For example, accessing an element in an array by its index, such as retrieving the fourth element of an array, is an O(1) operation, which can be described using a constant c.
Imagine you have a large dataset, and you need to find a specific element. If this operation can be done in constant time, it means that no matter how large your dataset gets, the time it takes to find that element remains the same. This efficiency is crucial in scenarios where speed is essential, such as in real-time systems.
Linear Time Complexity: O(n)
Linear time complexity, denoted as O(n), means the time required grows in direct proportion to the input size. In other words, the runtime increases linearly with the input size. An example of an algorithm with linear time complexity is a for loop that traverses an array, processing each element one by one.
For example, finding the sum of all elements in an array takes a runtime that increases linearly with the number of elements (n), as each element is processed once.
For a function to be considered O(n), the input size (n) must be greater than a constant k, where k is 0. This straightforward relationship makes linear time complexity easy to understand and predict.
Logarithmic Time Complexity: O(log n)
Logarithmic time complexity, represented as O(log n), refers to a time complexity where growth slows down over time, specifically reducing by half with each iteration. This type of complexity indicates that the algorithm’s running time increases slower than the input size, specifically at a logarithmic rate. An example of an algorithm with logarithmic time complexity is the binary search algorithm, which efficiently finds an element in a sorted array.
Recognizing logarithmic time complexity is crucial for evaluating algorithm efficiency, especially with large datasets. For instance, binary search efficiently locates an element in a sorted array by repeatedly halving the search interval, making it highly desirable in search operations.
Quadratic Time Complexity: O(n²)
Quadratic time complexity is represented as O(n²). This indicates that the time required by the algorithm is proportional to the square of the input size. A quadratic time algorithm has a running time that grows quadratically as the input size increases. This means that larger inputs will significantly impact the algorithm’s performance. Bubble sort is an example of an algorithm with quadratic time complexity.
In algorithms with O(n²) time complexity, the number of operations grows quadratically as the input size increases, affecting the algorithm’s running time. Imagine a scenario where you need to compare every element in an array with every other element.
The function print_values_with_repeat demonstrates O(n²) time complexity. This type of complexity is common in algorithms that involve nested loops.
Cubic Time Complexity: O(n³)
Cubic time complexity, represented as O(n³), indicates that the running time increases with the cube of the input size. An example of an algorithm with cubic time complexity is naive matrix multiplication.
Consider a scenario where you need to multiply two matrices. The number of operations required grows cubically with the input size, making the algorithm significantly slower as the dataset increases.
Understanding cubic time complexity is crucial for recognizing the limitations of certain algorithms when handling large datasets.
Exponential Time Complexity: O(2^n)
Exponential time complexity, denoted as O(2ⁿ), means that the number of operations doubles with each additional unit of input. The recursive calculation of Fibonacci numbers serves as an example of an O(2ⁿ) function, demonstrating the exponential time complexity often associated with recursive algorithms.
For instance, generating all subsets of a set is an algorithm with exponential time complexity, showing how resource requirements grow rapidly with input size. The recursive Fibonacci function doubles its calls at every level of recursion, making exponential time complexity particularly challenging for large datasets.
Identifying exponential time complexity highlights the limitations and potential inefficiencies of certain algorithms.
Factorial Time Complexity: O(n!)
Factorial time complexity, represented as O(n!), grows extremely fast, as it involves calculating the product of all positive integers up to n. Generating all permutations of an array is an example of an algorithm with factorial time complexity.
Factorial time complexity occurs in scenarios such as finding all possible permutations of a set of elements. This type of complexity is rare but important to understand, as it highlights the extreme growth rate of certain algorithms. Recognizing factorial time complexity helps in assessing the feasibility of algorithms for large datasets.
Big O Complexity Chart
Big O notation allows for comparing algorithm performance under varying conditions. Different algorithms exhibit various Big O complexities, such as O(1) for constant time and O(n²) for quadratic time. A visual chart summarizing these complexities helps in understanding and comparing algorithm efficiency.
A Big O complexity chart typically includes different notations, their corresponding time complexities, and common examples. This visual representation quickly identifies algorithm efficiency, making it a valuable tool for software engineers and developers.
The chart also highlights the impact of input size on runtime, clarifying how different algorithms scale.
How to Calculate Time Complexity
Calculating time complexity involves understanding how an algorithm scales with input size and identifying the highest-order term in the algorithm’s expression. Big O notation helps programmers evaluate how algorithms scale, allowing them to optimize code based on expected performance metrics. For instance, the expression f(n) = 3n² + 2n + 1000Logn + 5000 simplifies to O(n²) since the highest-order term dominates the growth rate.
When calculating Big O complexity, constants are ignored because they do not affect the overall classification. As input size grows, lower-order terms become less significant and can be disregarded.
The overall Big O complexity reflects the highest-order term after dropping constants. Understanding these rules is crucial for accurately determining the time complexity of algorithms.
How to Calculate Space Complexity
Space complexity includes both the auxiliary space and the space occupied by the input data. Auxiliary space refers to the additional temporary memory used by an algorithm apart from the input data. In-place algorithms typically require less additional space compared to non-in-place algorithms.
Recursive functions often require more memory due to maintaining multiple function calls in the stack. For algorithms involving loops, the space complexity can grow linearly with the input size.
The space complexity of an algorithm that creates an array of size n is O(n), while for a 2D matrix of size n × n, it is O(n²). Understanding space complexity helps optimize memory usage and improve overall algorithm efficiency.
Properties of Big O Notation
Big O notation sets an upper limit on an algorithm’s time relative to input size. To find the Big O of an expression:
Identify the highest-order term.
Ignore lower-order terms and constants.
Focus on the term with the highest growth rate, as it determines the Big O notation.
In functions expressed as finite sums, the term with the highest growth rate dictates the overall order. For polynomially bounded functions, lower-order terms can be neglected as the input size increases. Understanding these properties is crucial for accurately determining time complexity.
Upper Bound
Big O notation provides an upper bound on the running time of algorithms, offering a mathematical way to describe their efficiency. This upper bound is critical in algorithm analysis, as it indicates the worst-case scenario for running time. For instance, in a binary search, the worst-case scenario occurs when the element is not found, requiring the algorithm to search through the entire input array, which helps establish a performance bound for the process.
By focusing on the worst-case scenario, Big O notation aids engineers in designing reliable algorithms that maintain consistent performance under challenging conditions. This approach ensures that an algorithm’s running time will not exceed the specified upper limit, regardless of input size.
Constant Factor
In Big O notation, eliminating constant factors does not change the classification of an algorithm. Key points include:
Constant multipliers, such as numerical factors in an expression, are considered insignificant in the overall scaling of an algorithm.
For example, whether an algorithm’s time complexity is 5n or 500n, it is still classified as O(n) because the constant factor does not influence the classification.
Big O notation focuses on how an algorithm scales with input size rather than constant factors. This principle simplifies the analysis and comparison of algorithms, ensuring the main focus remains on the growth rate, not specific numerical coefficients.
Sum Rule
The sum rule in Big O notation determines the combined complexity of multiple terms based on the largest term.
The overall complexity of a function that consists of multiple terms is defined by its dominant term.
For example, if a function includes terms like n², n, and log n, the n² term dominates.
Therefore, the overall complexity is O(n²).
This rule simplifies determining Big O notation for complex functions by focusing on the term with the highest growth rate. By considering only the largest term, we can accurately describe the algorithm’s behavior as the input size increases.
Comparison of Big O, Big Ω, and Big θ Notations
Big O notation focuses on the worst-case execution time to determine the efficiency of an algorithm. It expresses an algorithm’s upper limit for performance, primarily considering the worst-case scenario. When analyzing algorithm efficiency, Big O represents the maximum runtime, providing a limit on the algorithm’s performance under the heaviest load.
In contrast, Big Ω notation defines the lower limit of an algorithm’s growth rate, indicating the minimum time required for completion based on input size. Theta notation (Θ) provides a tight bound on an algorithm’s growth rate, describing the exact asymptotic behavior of its running time.
These notations are used collectively to analyze algorithm performance, addressing different scenarios, including worst-case, best-case, and average-case outcomes.
Fonzi: Revolutionizing AI Engineer Hiring
In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence, hiring top-tier talent is crucial for staying ahead. Fonzi is revolutionizing how companies connect with elite AI engineers through its curated talent marketplace. The platform streamlines hiring by connecting companies with highly qualified candidates via a structured marketplace that emphasizes careful vetting.
Fonzi uses a structured process, including a monthly Match Day:
Companies present salary-confirmed offers to pre-vetted candidates.
This ensures a fast and efficient hiring process.
How Fonzi Works
Candidates undergo a rigorous selection process to ensure that only the most qualified individuals are matched with hiring companies. Fonzi’s data-driven approach pairs candidates with companies based on qualifications and role requirements. Structured evaluations with built-in fraud detection and bias auditing make the platform reliable and consistent, ensuring a seamless experience for both candidates and employers.
Benefits of Using Fonzi
Fonzi connects companies with high-intent candidates ready for immediate interviews, accelerating hiring. Access to a pool of pre-vetted candidates allows companies to quickly find the right talent, especially in the competitive AI industry. The platform minimizes biases through structured evaluations and provides transparency, allowing candidates to choose their preferred company from multiple offers.
Fonzi for Startups and Enterprises
Fonzi offers tailored hiring solutions for startups and large enterprises, adapting to different scales of recruitment. By providing access to a diverse AI engineering talent pool, Fonzi enables scalable, consistent hiring without high upfront costs, supporting growth and success across organizations of all sizes.
Summary
Understanding Big O notation is essential for evaluating and optimizing algorithm efficiency in computer science. By categorizing algorithms based on their runtime and space complexities, Big O notation provides a framework for predicting performance as input sizes grow. This guide has explored various time complexities, from constant to factorial, with real-world examples illustrating each concept.
By mastering Big O notation, software engineers can make informed decisions about algorithm selection and optimization, ensuring efficient and scalable solutions. Whether you’re a seasoned developer or new to the field, this knowledge is invaluable for creating robust, high-performing applications. Understanding and utilizing Big O notation can elevate your coding skills to new heights.
